Three Reasons 'Templating' Is A Bad Practice When Developing Bid Strategy
Jordan Kelly

Adopting an "anti-template" policy is just as important in the development of bid strategy, as it is in the production of the end submission. 


Here are three primary reasons to avoid what I call “templated thinking” when formulating strategy:


1)  Genericism vs Uniqueness:  A Process that Doesn’t Match the Required Mindset


Once the nature of a procurement or project is understood, a bid team should endeavour to identify and place focus on the characteristics of that procurement or project that are unique to that specific project.


The use of pre-formulated, generic outlines is potentially counterproductive.


2)  Strategy Development Should be Led By A Strategic Thinker


Running a group through a pre-determined list of questions does not allow conversations to evolve naturally.


Instead, thinking and discussion should be channelled along in a lateral – albeit controlled – fashion, developing all threads of input. This is something a template can’t achieve.


3)  A Template-Directed Discussion Will Hit An Early Wall


A template stops the discussion at a generically pre-determined point – possibly (well) short of the best possible strategic decision. 

THINK AND WIN BIDS
Winning High-Value, High-Stakes Bids through Superior Questioning, Listening & Thinking Skills

The three fundamental skills of a genuinely sharp, sustainably successful bid professional are the ability to think, listen and ask quality questions.



Furthermore, formulating successful business development and bid strategies is the process of well-directed research and thinking; not the product of tools and templates.

THINK AND WIN BIDS
Winning High-Value, High-Stakes Bids through Superior Questioning, Listening & Thinking Skills

(Six-Pack)

Ideal to ensure your entire team of writers and contributing subject matter experts are all on the same page, Think and Win Bids is offered as a six-pack (six books for the price of five).