Three Reasons 'Templating 'Is A Bad Practice When Developing Bid Strategy
Jordan Kelly

Adopting an "anti-template" policy is just as important in the development of bid strategy, as it is in the production of the end submission. 


There are three primary reasons to avoid what I call “templated thinking” when formulating strategy:


1)  Genericism vs Uniqueness:  A Process that Doesn’t Match the Required Mindset


Once the nature of a procurement or project is understood, a bid team should endeavour to identify and place focus on the characteristics of that procurement or project that are unique  to that specific project.


The use of pre-formulated, generic outlines is more often than not, highly counterproductive.


2)  Strategy Development Should be Led By A Strategic Thinker


Running a group through a pre-determined list of questions does not allow conversations to evolve naturally.


Instead, thinking and discussion should be channelled along in a lateral – albeit controlled – fashion, developing all threads of input. This is something a template can’t achieve.


3)  A Template-Directed Discussion Will Hit An Early Wall


A template stops the discussion at a generically pre-determined point – possibly (well) short of the best possible strategic decision.

THINK AND WIN BIDS

Winning High-Stakes, High-Value Bids through Superior Questioning, Listening & Thinking Skills

The three fundamental skills of a genuinely sharp, sustainably successful bid professional are the ability to think, listen and ask  quality questions.


Furthermore, formulating successful business development and bid strategies is the process of well-directed research and thinking; not the product of tools and templates.


Also available as a six-pack (6 books for the price of 5).

BID COMMANDOS
On-Target Strategy for Mission-Critical Bids

A 13-Module course to ensure your team excels at every stage of a formal bidding process - from the initial bid/no bid analysis, right through to the client de-briefing session/s.